Thousands of protestors in cities across North America marched on the weekend, calling attention to the need for science in society and government. So it feels fitting that this week we’re looking at a solution to a long-standing ethical, environmental, and economic problem that could be solved with science.
A paper titled “Adaptive use of non-lethal strategies for minimizing wolf-sheep conflict in Idaho” was published in the February edition of the Journal of Mammalogy. It isn’t the first paper or study that’s looked at solutions to ending conflict on livestock grazing lands, but it certainly is expansive and exciting.
Along with biologists, local ranchers, and a United States Department of Agriculture researcher, Suzanne Stone of Defenders of Wildlife collected data of depredation and management practices from two similar, yet separate areas of land in the Gem state. What they found confirms, scientifically, what many have said for some time: non-lethal deterrents work better than lethal control, cost less, and save thousands of lives.
To talk more about this incredible study, the findings, the questions that still need to be asked, and what all of this means for a potential end to the war on wildlife, Defenders of Wildlife’s Suzanne Stone joined Defender Radio.
To listen to this episode click the 'play' button below,download the MP3, visit us onYouTube,Google Play Music, theiTunes store,Stitcher,or atTuneIn. Make sure you follow@DefenderRadio on Twitter,Facebook, andInstagram, too!
